Grendel Screen Printing
   
Grendel Screen PrintingGrendel Screen Printing
March 2005 issue of PRINTWEAR
Screen-Mesh Characteristics
What color and thickness have to do with it

 

by Douglas Grigar, Master Screen Printer

 Special-Effect Garment Printing

(A version of this article originally appeared in the March 2005 issue of PRINTWEAR.)

 


The role of mesh in the final print is unquestionably a critical factor. Screen mesh characteristics such as thread count and tension play a major role in the quality and predictability of any print, but there are other factors to be explored. This article will concentrate on mesh-fabric thread color and thickness as they affect exposure.

Color and UV-Light Travel

Tint or mesh-fabric color plays several roles in stencil exposure, specifically affecting time, resolution, and exposure latitude. Dyed mesh will take longer to expose, often by a factor of 1.5 to double the exposure time of white mesh. White or un-dyed mesh presents less of an obstacle for ultraviolet light to pass into, along and through the threads, while dyed mesh slightly hinders the passage of such light.

While the unhindered passage of light may at first seem to be a better choice for exposure, the exact details of what happens with un-dyed mesh prove in reality to be quite different. White mesh allows for excessive light transmission and refraction, lessening the quality of stencil-edge resolution (see Figure 1).

 

[Figure 1: White and yellow mesh. With all else equal, the white mesh on the left loses considerable edge definition on the dot shapes, in comparison to the yellow mesh shown on the right.]

 

The reason is that white mesh permits the passage of light into, through, and along the threads similar to how fiber-optic cables carry light along their length. Dyed mesh resists and lessens light refraction, and also transmits considerably less light in the fiber-optic effect than does the white mesh. The drawings in Figure 2 illustrate how light passing through white fabric tends to create cone shapes as it progressively exposes more emulsion around the threads. Conversely, dyed mesh threads suppress such light refraction, producing a smaller cone effect, enabling the stencil to hold higher detail and resolution.

[Figure 2: Dyed mesh at the bottom has less emulsion closing in on its open areas. Tinted threads help reduce light refraction (light scattering into the stencil) and help create sharper stencil edges.]

 

Light emanating from white threads also causes the stencil to close in on the open space, a phenomenon called “thread growth.” Thread growth is simply tubular sleeves of exposed emulsion extending into the open areas of the stencil (see Figure 3).

 

[Figure 3: Thread growth occurs when exposed emulsion (shown in red) forms tubes or sleeves over the threads into the stencil’s open areas; the black arrows mark the edge of the positive.]

 

Thread growth on white mesh threads is not only a result of overexposure but is a typical reaction to the excessive light refraction and the fiber-optic effect aggravated by the light-transmitting capacity of white mesh. Some degree of thread growth will be evident in all stencils of photo-reactive emulsion coated on white mesh (se Figure 4). Thread growth is the reason for the “fingers” of emulsion radiating from the dots on the white thread example shown in Figure 1; dot resolution obviously suffers from the common thread growth when using un-dyed mesh.

[Figure 4: Thread growth is a phenomenon that manifests itself in photo-reactive stencils made of white mesh, even if the stencil is not overexposed.]

 

The Time it Takes

While dyed mesh resists light refraction and dilution, it also will take longer to expose; often, dyed mesh will take double the exposure time as white mesh of the same thread count and diameter.

An often overlooked benefit of dyed mesh, however, is the gain in exposure time flexibility. Acceptable stencil exposure time is referred to as the latitude of the emulsion; in simple terms, this is the time before and after the optimum exposure where the stencil produced is still of high quality - it could also be referred to as the available “screw-up latitude.”

Capillary Film as a Partial Exception

The nature of capillary film is to place the majority of its thickness on the surface of the substrate-side of the mesh, making it less susceptible to some of the negative effects of white mesh.

Capillary film will show some signs of thread growth - specifically, where it joins the mesh - but, as most of the stencil is past the knuckle high-point of the mesh weave, little of its bridging, resolution, or detail will be affected. Fine detail can be closed in, though, even when using capillary films on white mesh.

The reality is that few plants would stock white mesh higher than 200-tpi, and what little thread growth could close in on small detail would be overshadowed anyway, by the impact of the thicker threads of the mesh crossing and blocking the open areas of the stencil (see Figure 5).

[Figure 5: This visual example shows threads under capillary film crossing and blocking a small square dot, any loss of detail from the use of white mesh is inconsequential compared to the fact that the mesh threads themselves are blocking this size of stencil opening.]

 

Extending Target Times

Regardless of the emulsion used, dyed mesh will lengthen the acceptable exposure latitude and will even extend the exposure time where a useable stencil can be produced.

White mesh has a more critical and smaller exposure latitude, and quickly looses detail when overexposed. Open stencil areas on white mesh are closed in by thread growth, and the threshold points for each level of detail are lost in an accelerated and progressive manner as exposure time is lengthened (see Figure 6).

[Figure 6: This example shows how the use of dyed mesh (top) can produce a useable stencil at an exposure time much greater than the optimum. White mesh (bottom) has long ago lost usability with such an extended exposure time.]

 

Old Ways Are Not Always the Best

The older compromise of white mesh on low thread counts and dyed on high thread counts first started years ago when dyed mesh was considerably higher in cost than white mesh. Dyed mesh was purchased only when the mesh thread count was high, and where required detail and resolution demanded a dyed mesh.

The reasons were obvious. Shops allowed price to dictate where compromise in quality was not as large a factor. The common practice was to choose white meshes in thread counts lower than 200-tpi and dyed mesh for higher counts.

The practice of using white mesh in low thread counts is so imbedded in the industry that it is not uncommon, even today, to see suppliers and manufacturers stock a majority of white mesh in the lower thread counts. Many plants both large and small continue this practice without actually understanding why the choices have become standard.

The current prices of dyed meshes now hover in ranges less than 5% higher than the same thread counts in white, making the old issue of price as a factor now a historical phantasm.

The price difference is now so small that suppliers and manufacturers of mesh products don’t even bother to keep dual pricing charts. And typically, there’s no additional charge for yellow mesh, regardless of count, for most suppliers’ products.

Thickness and Exposure

We all know lower mesh counts can take longer to expose than higher mesh counts, the reason being simple thickness of mesh profile combined with emulsion thickness. As the light has to move into and past emulsion and mesh threads, it is progressively filtered to lower intensity as it travels deeper into the emulsion and threads. White or dyed mesh will feature this effect, but the added light refraction of white mesh will cause an acceleration of the cone effect illustrated in Figure 2.

Thicker stencils and thicker mesh profiles will also increase the cone effect. With the greater distance traveled into the emulsion and mesh thickness, the more the light closes in on the open stencil areas. Simply put, distance adds to the cone effect similarly to the widening beam from a flashlight.

Individual thread thickness and the total mesh profile should be taken into consideration when judging exposure. The most obvious effect of this is that each and every change in thread count, individual thread thickness, and color will have effects on the optimum exposure time.

Knowledge to Factor Into Challenges

All screen printers progress in their experience and add to their wealth of knowledge. As shops take on more challenging jobs, smaller and often overlooked factors will become issues to be tackled. Smaller, technical nuances can often be converted from troublesome variables into useful tools with which to gain desired results.

 
Continue
  Automatic Press

  Videos

  Live Virtual Classroom

  On-Demand Virtual Training

  Industry Support/Education

  Art, Positives, Registration

  Screen Printing Inks

  Business Products

  Dryers

  Flash Units

  Frames

  Mesh

  Numbering Attachments

  Press Attachments

  Presses

  Screen Prep/Exposure

  Supplies

Grendel Screen Printing

 

 

         
  Specials Search Shopping Cart
Language English
Create an account Contact Us now in your cart

 

Customer Login

Terms/Conditions

0 items

 


Secure
(click)

 

Search our site using TheGrendel.com Search from
Click images below to search by select manufacturer:
---- --- - --- - ----- - --- - --- -
 
---- --- - ---- --- - ---- --- -Grendel Screen Printing
   
Copyright © 2005 The Grendel Powered by osCommerce
   
Privacy Notice (click)

Terms of Use Disclaimer
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for the sale of any goods and services, is governed by the Terms of Use Disclaimer. By using this site you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use Disclaimer and the disclaimers and caveats contained in this site, and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.


Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/thegren/public_html/Shop/osc/includes/functions/sessions.php on line 111